We had interesting discussion when I read this to the kids this morning. The fundamental differences between bible time slavery and Negro slavery. The fact that the slaves were basically "indentured" by family members, for a price, but were to be set free after 7 years and didn't have to buy their freedom. I did still find it difficult to read the laws about their wives and children still being "possessions" of the master though... hard for me to understand.
I also found the laws governing the "first wife" in v10-11 difficult to understand. It doesn't condemn the taking of a second wife, and frees the first wife if her husband doesn't provide adequately for her needs.
She goes free and then what? What does that freedom mean?
This chapter brought up questions I had last week about the Jews not practicing the stoning as the law orders them to. Why not? When they are so set on following the law to a T what out have they found to avoid disciplinary action? I will have to go and research this.
why stoning doesn't take place in Israel... the criteria for being a witness to the guilty party's crime was long and impossible. Two witnesses were necessary and here are the criteria for finding someone guilty and a candidate for stoning;
The witnesses had to be acceptable to the court. Acceptability was limited to:
Adult Jewish men who were known to keep the commandments;
The witnesses had to see each other at the time of the sin;
The witnesses had to be able to speak clearly, without any speech impediment or hearing deficit (to ensure that the warning and the response were done);
The witnesses could not be related to each other or to the accused.
The witnesses had to see each other, and both of them had to give a warning (hatra'ah) to the person that the sin they were about to commit was a capital offense;
This warning had to be delivered within seconds of the performance of the sin (in the time it took to say, "Peace unto you, my Rabbi and my Master");
In the same amount of time, the person about to sin had to: Respond that s/he was familiar with the punishment, but they were going to sin anyway;
The Beth Din had to examine each witness separately; and if even one point of their evidence was contradictory - even if a very minor point, such as eye color - the evidence was considered contradictory and the evidence was not heeded;
The Beth Din had to consist of 23 judges;
The majority could not be a simple majority - the split verdict that would allow conviction had to be at least 13 to 11 in favor of conviction;
If the Beth Din arrived at a unanimous verdict of guilty, the person was let go - the idea being that if no judge could find anything exculpatory about the accused, there was something wrong with the court.
The witnesses were appointed by the court to be the executioners. As a result, it was next to impossible to convict someone of a capital offense in Judaism.
oh my. that leads to the question, WHY THEN HAVE CAPITAL OFFENSES???? Why have a punishment that you will never mete out? Crazy.
I had a lot of the same thoughts as you reading this passage - interesting the questions that it would bring up for your kids having just gone through black slavery hey?
Here's one thing that really struck me as I read the notes about these passages... regarding the women and injury causing accidental chilbirth -
COMPENSATION was mandatory even if there was no injury to the mother or child, and judges were brought in to make sure that the damages were fair and not calculated out of vengeance.
RETALIATION applied if there was injury caused to the mother or child, and the punishment matched but did not exceed the damage done to the victim.
so interesting to me that the Law allowed room for both compensation AND retaliation.
and here's what I found particularly interesting - "significantly, for the abortion debate, the fetus was considered a person; thus, someone was held accountable for its death or injury"
We are reading our way through the bible one chapter per day. The idea behind my personal reading plan is to read through books chronologically, but not solely one book at a time. Thus on Monday we read from the books of the law, Tuesday the books of kings and judges, Wednesday the books of Jewish History, Thursday Books of Wisdom, Friday the Prophets, Saturday the Gospels and Sunday the Epistles. The next Monday we pick up at the chapter we left off in ancient history. You may think that this would be disjointed and would cause you to "lose your groove" but I have found the contrary to be true, the threads of promise, redemption and grace show up more clearly as I make my way slowly through these books in a parrallel fashion and when I pick up where I left off a week before I am reminded of things that stood out to me from last week's reading. Journaling is a big part of my processing scripture and fixing particular tidbits in my mind for the purpose of life application. I would love to have you join me!
Basic Reading Plan
Mon (Law): Genesis-Joshua
Tues (Rulers): Judges-Chronicles
Wed (History): Ezra-Psalms
Thurs (Wisdom): Prov-Jer
Fri (Prophets): Lam-Malachi
Sat (Gospels): Matthew-Acts
Sun (Epistles) Romans-Revelation.
The theme I have given each section is general. Joshua is not a book of the law and Psalms is not a book of history. The main chunk of reading in each section is, however, suitably classified as the theme it is under. In order to make the sections even out to have the same general number of books/chapters, this was the closest I could come. Otherwise one would be reading through certain sections (like the Law) for instance, much more often than the wisdom books, etc.
(Fellowship is) an expression of both love and humility. [It] springs from a desire to bring benefit to others, coupled with a sense of personal weakness and need. It has a double motive – the wish to help, and to be helped; to edify, and to be edified. It has a double aim – to do, and to receive, good. It is a seeking by Christian people to know God better through sharing with each other what, individually, they have learned of Him already. J.I. Packer.
A few introductory words of encouragement....
Think of your time feeding on God's Word as a vital aspect of your health and wellness. You wouldn't go a week without brushing your teeth, or eating physical food, don't treat the nourishing of your soul by the Word of God with any less care.
Don't cram multiple chapters if you fall behind of plan, but *do* "back-read" if you have the passion and earnest desire to do so. My habit if I miss a chapter is usually to leave it until that book comes up again the next week (based on my own reading plan) and then read two consecutive chapters rather than the one I am scheduled to read.
Don't be legalistic about the when and how. If you don't get a quiet time in the morning, THAT'S OKAY. Find a moment in the afternoon to grab a drink, sit down and put your feet up, and soak up a chapter. And if that doesn't happen, THAT'S OKAY. Take 15-20 minutes at the end of the day to plump some pillows up in your bed and soak it up before you go to sleep. And if that doesn't happen, IT'S OKAY. Tomorrow is a new day. Don't let the enemy discourage you from spending time in the word TODAY because you didn't YESTERDAY. That's just dumb. Did you get that? DUMB.
If you don't have time to read, meditate. Allow God to bring a passage of scripture to mind and allow yourself to listen. Take time to be quiet in your spirit. While you are washing dishes, folding laundry, vacuuming... cleaning bathrooms.
Spruce things up. Get yourself a PRETTY journal and jot down little things that stand out to you. Use your favourite mug or a pretty glass to pour your favourite drink. Sit in your favourite spot (this could change from day to day and depending on the time of day you read. A sunny spot on the porch in the morning, a wing back chair and a blanket if it's chilly, a garden swing in the shade on a hot afternoon, or plumped up in bed with soft lamplight in the evening. Again, don't be legalistic about the location, pick a happy spot that fits the moment/opportunity.) Oh, and DON'T wait for the pretty journal. Plain lined notepaper or even a crumpled scrap paper will work just FINE until you get one....
Remember while you read, God's word is FOR YOU. yes, it was written to a particular audience in a particular time in history and for a particular reason. But it was also written with YOU in mind, TODAY in mind, and is designed to give you strength and wisdom for the journey.
Claim ONE part of the passage and take it to heart. Read through the chapter without too much introspection at first and see what part most stands out to you. Go back and look at that part more specifically and ask yourself what is in there for YOU?
Ask relevant questions. I usually look at a passage with 2 questions in mind. 1. What does this passage tell me about God's character? 2. What does this passage tell me about humanity (ie, ME, in relation to God? a final and very important question to ask is "What does this passage require of me on a practical level?" Write down one attitude, practice or truth you want you live out TODAY in light of what God has just revealed to you. This is how we take ownership of the Word of God and allow it to relate to us and shape us on a personal level.
Build yourself a monument. As I ponder a passages relevance to me I journal the thoughts that arise. Jotting them down somehow cements my convictions in my mind, almost like laying out stones in a monument so I can go back to that place later and be reminded. I also use those notes to come here and share my thoughts later with others.
Keep your actual quiet time concise. This will help make it more likely the habit will continue to happen on a regular basis. Better to spend 15 minutes in the word daily, than 1 hour once a week.
Don't require absolute "alone" and uninterrupted time (without kids around). If they are around, they can learn to not interrupt you for 15 minutes, just like you spend time with other people when they are around, you can spend time with the Lord with them around too.
Think of God’s Word as a love letter to you. When you read stories of God’s wrath in the Old Testament, think about WHAT love paid the price for all that wrath and how a hand that once smote anyone who dared touch the ark of His covenant now beckons YOU to draw near to the throne of grace. Read everything in light of who God is and how much He loves mankind that in spite of our being so deprived, His love story reaches out, encompasses us, washes us clean, and seeks to draw us near.
May you seek Him, may He be found by you, and may you be blessed on the journey.
3 comments:
We had interesting discussion when I read this to the kids this morning. The fundamental differences between bible time slavery and Negro slavery. The fact that the slaves were basically "indentured" by family members, for a price, but were to be set free after 7 years and didn't have to buy their freedom. I did still find it difficult to read the laws about their wives and children still being "possessions" of the master though... hard for me to understand.
I also found the laws governing the "first wife" in v10-11 difficult to understand. It doesn't condemn the taking of a second wife, and frees the first wife if her husband doesn't provide adequately for her needs.
She goes free and then what? What does that freedom mean?
This chapter brought up questions I had last week about the Jews not practicing the stoning as the law orders them to. Why not? When they are so set on following the law to a T what out have they found to avoid disciplinary action? I will have to go and research this.
why stoning doesn't take place in Israel... the criteria for being a witness to the guilty party's crime was long and impossible. Two witnesses were necessary and here are the criteria for finding someone guilty and a candidate for stoning;
The witnesses had to be acceptable to the court. Acceptability was limited to:
Adult Jewish men who were known to keep the commandments;
The witnesses had to see each other at the time of the sin;
The witnesses had to be able to speak clearly, without any speech impediment or hearing deficit (to ensure that the warning and the response were done);
The witnesses could not be related to each other or to the accused.
The witnesses had to see each other, and both of them had to give a warning (hatra'ah) to the person that the sin they were about to commit was a capital offense;
This warning had to be delivered within seconds of the performance of the sin (in the time it took to say, "Peace unto you, my Rabbi and my Master");
In the same amount of time, the person about to sin had to:
Respond that s/he was familiar with the punishment, but they were going to sin anyway;
The Beth Din had to examine each witness separately; and if even one point of their evidence was contradictory - even if a very minor point, such as eye color - the evidence was considered contradictory and the evidence was not heeded;
The Beth Din had to consist of 23 judges;
The majority could not be a simple majority - the split verdict that would allow conviction had to be at least 13 to 11 in favor of conviction;
If the Beth Din arrived at a unanimous verdict of guilty, the person was let go - the idea being that if no judge could find anything exculpatory about the accused, there was something wrong with the court.
The witnesses were appointed by the court to be the executioners.
As a result, it was next to impossible to convict someone of a capital offense in Judaism.
oh my. that leads to the question, WHY THEN HAVE CAPITAL OFFENSES???? Why have a punishment that you will never mete out?
Crazy.
I had a lot of the same thoughts as you reading this passage - interesting the questions that it would bring up for your kids having just gone through black slavery hey?
Here's one thing that really struck me as I read the notes about these passages...
regarding the women and injury causing accidental chilbirth -
COMPENSATION was mandatory even if there was no injury to the mother or child, and judges were brought in to make sure that the damages were fair and not calculated out of vengeance.
RETALIATION applied if there was injury caused to the mother or child, and the punishment matched but did not exceed the damage done to the victim.
so interesting to me that the Law allowed room for both compensation AND retaliation.
and here's what I found particularly interesting - "significantly, for the abortion debate, the fetus was considered a person; thus, someone was held accountable for its death or injury"
I love that.
Post a Comment