Saturday, May 15, 2010

Matthew 1

4 comments:

Unknown said...

I love Jesus geneology. I love that Tamar with her broken story, Rahab with her story of redemption, Ruth with her story of faithfulness are listed, for people to consider how God takes people from all pain, paths, experiences and histories to meld them into His kingdom and use them for His purposes.

Chris said...

I went off on a tangent, trying to reconcile in my head the two geneologies. LOVE that in Luke, we not only get taken back to Adam, but that our lineage goes right back to GOD. Our Father. How fitting.

Jude said...

I was just loving the geneology of Jesus. It has only been very recently that the names on the list mean something to me in that I have a sense of many of their stories. It is truly fascinating to think of Jesus being a descendant of the most evil king in the Bible--King Ahaz.

Chris--were you able to reconcile the two geneologies on your head? It is a really interesting question and I had not even noticed this until you pointed it out but just thought I would share what my study bible says about the inconsistency.

"From Abraham to David, the genealogies are largely the same, but from David on they are different. Some scholars suggest that this is because Matthew traces the complete line of Joseph to David. A more likely explanation, however, is that Matthew follows the line of Joseph (Jesus' legal father), while Luke emphasizes that of Mary (Jesus' blood relative). Although tracing a genealogy through the mother's side was unusual, so was the virgin birth. Luke's explanation here that Jesus was the son of Joseph "so it was thought" (v23 NIV) brings to mind his explicit virgin birth statement (1:34-35) and suggests the importance of the role of Mary in Jesus' genealogy."

Not sure if that clarifies or not but you certainly sent me looking for an explanation. Thanks for that.

Chris said...

I had heard that one was Mary's line and one was Joseph's, but both Matt & Luke mention Joseph and his father. ?